Alpena County

MichiganPopulation: 28,911
78
/100
Strong Buy
#14 of 1,000 counties
#2 in Michigan (83 counties)
Analysis by RentalCalcs ResearchIndependent data + algorithm-driven scoring
Updated August 7, 2026Sources: Zillow ZHVI, Zillow ZORI, US Census ACS, Tax Foundation

Market Snapshot

$195,278
Median Home Price
15% below national median
$11,799/mo
Est. Rent
Based on regional data
6.04%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Estimated from price data
+$0
Est. Monthly Cash Flow
With 20% down at 6.9% rate

Alpena market analysis

Alpena County sits at a median home price of $195,278, up 6.43% year-over-year, with an affordability index of 88, meaning it remains accessible relative to most U.S. markets. The data provided does not include a median rent figure or cap rate calculation, so a direct price-to-rent ratio or cash-flow estimate cannot be stated here. What the scoring reflects is a market that scores 90 out of 100 on appreciation and 88 on affordability, but registers a 0 on the cash-flow score, placing it firmly on the appreciation end of the spectrum. Investors should read that cash-flow score as a signal that at current prices and a 6.85% rate, the numbers are unlikely to pencil for immediate yield. The play here is price growth and long-term hold, not day-one cash flow.

That profile suits a specific type of buyer: someone with a longer time horizon who prioritizes equity accumulation over monthly distributions. The 6.43% year-over-year price appreciation, on a base of under $200,000, means the dollar gain per property is still modest in absolute terms, but the percentage return on a $39,056 down payment is meaningful if the trend holds. A value-add operator who can force appreciation through renovation and push rents above whatever market level currently exists may find this more workable than a straight buy-and-hold cash-flow investor, but again, without a rent figure in the data, that math cannot be completed here. What is clear is that the 88 affordability score reduces the risk of buying at a cyclical peak, and the $195,000 entry point keeps capital requirements low.

No economic anchors or employer data were provided for Alpena County, so the local demand drivers, job base, and institutional stability of the rental pool cannot be assessed from this data set. A population of 28,911 does establish that this is a small, rural northern Michigan market. Small population counts in markets with high appreciation scores can reflect low transaction volume driving percentage swings more than broad demand, so investors should look carefully at the number of comparable sales behind that 6.43% figure before treating it as a durable trend.

On carry costs, the combined monthly tax and insurance burden is $293, based on a state-average effective property tax rate of 1.54% applied to the $195,278 purchase price, plus an insurance rate of 0.26%. That $293 figure, worth approximately $3,515 per year, is material to any underwrite. At a 1.54% rate, Michigan's state-average effective property tax deserves its own line on your model, not a rounding assumption. The important caveat here is that 1.54% is a state-average estimate from Tax Foundation 2024 data, and actual county and township rates in Alpena can differ in either direction. Pull the county assessor's current mill rate before finalizing any numbers. If the actual local rate comes in above the state average, the carry cost picture deteriorates further for a market already scoring zero on cash flow.

The primary risk in Alpena is concentration and demographic fragility. A county of under 29,000 people in rural northern Michigan has limited economic diversity by definition. If the local employment base contracts, there is no deep secondary rental demand to absorb vacancy. Without vacancy rate, crime, or regulatory data in this data set, specific figures cannot be cited, but the structural risk of a thin, small market is inherent and worth weighting heavily. Appreciation in small rural markets can be irregular, driven by a small number of sales or seasonal demand from second-home buyers, which makes the 90 appreciation score worth scrutinizing rather than accepting at face value.

Compared to the neighboring counties provided, Alpena at $195,278 and an overall score of 78 is priced above Iron County ($138,682, score 75) and Bay County ($175,060, score 75), but below Chippewa County ($202,561, score 78). The most instructive comparison is Wayne County, the only neighbor with both a rent figure and a rent-to-price ratio in the data set. Wayne County shows a rent-to-price ratio of 9.59% at a median home price of $172,107 and median rent of $1,375, which is a substantially more favorable cash-flow entry point than Alpena on the numbers available. Bay County offers a rent-to-price ratio of 7.84% at $175,060, also more yield-oriented than Alpena. An investor who needs current income should look at Wayne or Bay County before Alpena. Choose Alpena over its neighbors specifically when the investment thesis is low entry price with appreciation potential in a less competitive market, and when cash-on-cash return in year one is a secondary priority.

Last analyzed August 7, 2026. Based on the latest available Zillow and Census data for Alpena County.

Price History

Median Home Price

Median Rent

Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI

Score Breakdown

Overall Investment Score
78/100
78
Cash Flow(30%)
0/100

Rent data not available for cash flow calculation.

Appreciation(25%)
90/100

Based on 6.4% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.

Stability(25%)
50/100

Population data not available.

Affordability(20%)
88/100

Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.

Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.

Investment Outlook

Strengths

  • +Strong price appreciation (+6.4% YoY)
  • +Affordable relative to local incomes

Challenges

  • -Negative leverage (cap rate 0.0% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
  • -Limited rent data (estimates used)

Economic Indicators

Population
28,911
Median Income
Data pending
Unemployment Rate
Data pending
Price-to-Income
Data pending

Who this market fits

Best for
  • +Appreciation buyers: YoY growth is meaningfully above the long-run average
Skip if
  • You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)

Compare to Nearby Counties

CountyVerdict
CurrentAlpenaMI
78$195,278Est. pendingStrong Buy
ChippewaMI
78$202,561Est. pendingStrong BuyView
WayneMI
78$172,107$1,3759.59%Strong BuyView
CrawfordMI
76$179,615Est. pendingStrong BuyView
IronMI
75$138,682Est. pendingStrong BuyView
BayMI
75$175,060$1,1437.84%Strong BuyView

The Bottom Line

Strong BuyAlpena is a strong buy market with excellent fundamentals for buy-and-hold investors.

Alpena County in Michigan scores 78/100, ranking #14 of 1,000 US counties (top 2%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental roughly breaks even on cash flow. The deal works on appreciation or with better terms, not on month-one cash flow.

Monthly Cash Flow
+$0/mo
Cap Rate
0.0%
Cash-on-Cash
0.0%

Related markets

Frequently asked questions

Alpena County ranks 14th out of 1,000 US counties analyzed, placing it in the 98th percentile nationally for real estate investment potential. Within Michigan, it ranks 2nd out of 83 counties, making it one of the state's top investment markets.

Ready to Analyze a Deal in Alpena?

Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.