Huron market analysis
Huron County sits at a median home price of $197,035 with year-over-year appreciation of 5.05%, earning it an appreciation score of 86 out of 100 and a national ranking in the 95th percentile across the 1,000 counties in this dataset. That appreciation profile is the headline here. The cash flow score, however, reads zero, and the cap rate field returns zero as well, which signals that rental income data sufficient to underwrite a yield-driven deal is not available for this market. Investors should treat Huron as an appreciation-led play first and verify local rent levels independently before building a cash-flow model. The affordability index of 88 and a median price just under $200,000 suggest the entry point is accessible relative to the broader market, which supports price momentum continuing if demand holds.
Given that profile, Huron suits an appreciation buyer more directly than a cash-flow operator. The 5.05% annual price gain on a $197,035 asset represents roughly $9,950 in equity per year at current pace, and the affordability index of 88 means the county is not yet priced out of the range where owner-occupant and investor demand compete, which is historically the zone where appreciation sustains itself longer than in fully stretched markets. A cash-flow buyer needs to do independent rent research before committing, since the data here does not support a yield calculation. A value-add operator might find the low median price creates margin for forced appreciation through renovation, but without cap rate or rent comps in this dataset, that thesis requires additional due diligence on the ground.
No economic anchor data was provided for Huron County, so employment base and demand drivers cannot be addressed here. Investors evaluating rental demand stability should independently verify the county's major employers and whether the 31,461 population is growing, flat, or contracting, since population trajectory at this scale matters considerably for landlord vacancy exposure.
At $296 per month in combined property tax and insurance, carry costs deserve careful attention on any deal in this county. Michigan's state-average effective property tax rate of 1.54% is flagged as high, and at that rate on a $197,035 purchase, annual property taxes run approximately $3,034. That number earns its own line on your underwrite. On a leveraged buy-and-hold, $3,034 in annual tax alone is a meaningful drag on net operating income, particularly if gross rents are modest relative to price. The 0.26% insurance rate adds another $512 annually. The important caveat: the 1.54% figure is a state-average estimate from the Tax Foundation's 2024 data, and Huron County's actual township-level millage rate may differ materially, so confirm the specific parcel's tax bill before closing.
The primary risk here is concentration. Huron County's population of 31,461 means the tenant pool is narrow. In small rural markets, a single employer reduction or a demographic outflow can move vacancy rates sharply in ways that larger metros absorb more gradually. No vacancy or demographic trend data was provided in this dataset, but any investor underwriting a multi-unit or portfolio strategy in a county this size should stress-test occupancy assumptions harder than they would in a market of 300,000 or more.
Among the neighboring counties provided, Chippewa County is the only one with a higher median price at $202,561 and a marginally better overall score of 78 versus Huron's 76. Bay County offers the most useful comparison for yield-focused investors because it is the only neighbor with rent data: a median rent of $1,143 and a rent-to-price ratio of 0.00784 (roughly 0.78% monthly gross yield), with an overall score of 75 and a median price of $175,060. If cash flow is your primary objective, Bay County's published rent data makes it easier to underwrite a deal today than Huron, where that data is absent. Crawford, Iron, and Gratiot counties all score 75 to 76 with lower median prices ranging from $138,682 to $179,615, meaning they offer cheaper entry but no materially better overall scores. Choose Huron over its neighbors when you are prioritizing documented price appreciation at a still-affordable entry point and are willing to do the rental market legwork that the data here does not do for you.
Price History
Median Home Price
Median Rent
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
Score Breakdown
Rent data not available for cash flow calculation.
Based on 5.1% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Investment Outlook
Strengths
- +Strong price appreciation (+5.1% YoY)
- +Affordable relative to local incomes
Challenges
- -Negative leverage (cap rate 0.0% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
- -Limited rent data (estimates used)
Economic Indicators
Who this market fits
- +Appreciation buyers: YoY growth is meaningfully above the long-run average
- −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
Compare to Nearby Counties
Section 8 in Huron County: payment standards by ZIP, PHA waitlist status, and voucher counts are on VoucherMatch, the same HUD dataset with the tenant demand side attached.
The Bottom Line
Huron County in Michigan scores 76/100, ranking #40 of 1,000 US counties (top 5%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental roughly breaks even on cash flow. The deal works on appreciation or with better terms, not on month-one cash flow.