Lee County
Market Snapshot
Lee market analysis
Lee County, Georgia sits at a 7.34% rent-to-price ratio and a 4.77% cap rate, placing it on the moderate end of the cash-flow spectrum rather than at either extreme. At a median home price of $269,039 and median rent of $1,646, the raw numbers suggest a market that leans slightly toward appreciation over pure cash flow, though it doesn't fully commit to either. Year-over-year home price growth of 1.53% is modest, not the kind of compounding appreciation that justifies buying at thin yields in a gateway city. The overall score of 65 out of 100, ranking 253rd nationally out of 1,000 counties and in the 68th percentile, reflects a market that performs reasonably well without standing out in any single dimension.
The estimated investment math at a 6.85% rate tells the honest story: with a $53,808 down payment, the modeled monthly mortgage runs $1,410, expenses add another $576, and projected cash flow lands at negative $340 per month, producing a cash-on-cash return of negative 6.59%. That's a real number an investor has to own, not rationalize away. The cash flow score of 73 sounds contradictory until you recognize it's scored relative to other markets, many of which look worse at this rate environment. Lee County's cash flow score suggests it holds up better than most peers, but the absolute math still requires either a larger down payment to reduce debt service, a value-add play that pushes rents above the median, or a conviction that the 1.53% annual price growth and a 4.77% cap rate are sufficient total-return justification on an all-cash or lower-leverage basis.
The buyer this market suits best is not a pure cash-flow hunter chasing 1% rule properties, nor a high-conviction appreciation speculator. It fits a stability-oriented, lower-leverage investor who wants a sub-$270K entry point in a suburban Georgia market with an affordability index of 72, suggesting tenants can realistically afford prevailing rents without the income stress that drives vacancy in overpriced markets. A value-add operator who can acquire below the $269,039 median and push rents above $1,646 through renovation or professional management has a clearer path to positive cash flow than a turnkey buyer at full ask. The stability score of 50 is worth flagging: it's the weakest of Lee's five scores and signals that the market has meaningful exposure to economic or demographic variability, which a conservative underwrite should account for through higher vacancy reserves than you'd apply to a more established metro submarket.
On carry costs, the combined monthly tax and insurance burden runs approximately $287, using Georgia's state-average effective property tax rate of 0.92% and an insurance rate of 0.36%. The tax rate is flagged as normal, meaning it's neither a meaningful headwind nor a notable tailwind relative to national norms. At 0.92%, it is a state-average estimate and actual county or township assessments in Lee County may differ, so pull the county assessor's data before closing. The $287 monthly figure is already embedded in the $576 expense estimate above, but it's worth isolating because at this rent level, tax and insurance alone consume roughly 17% of gross rent before you touch maintenance, management, or capex reserves.
The primary risk to flag, supported by the data, is the population size: 32,968 residents makes Lee County a small market. Small markets concentrate rental demand around a narrower economic base, meaning a single large employer contraction or a demographic shift has outsized impact on occupancy compared to a county with ten times the population. The stability score of 50 reinforces this, and an investor should build a conservatively wider vacancy assumption into their model than they would in a larger suburban county.
Compared to its neighbors, Lee County commands the second-highest median price of the group at $269,039, behind only Pike County at $379,371. Floyd County is the only neighbor with both price and rent data available: at $227,971 median price and $1,219 median rent, Floyd's rent-to-price ratio of 6.42% is materially lower than Lee's 7.34%, and its overall score of 62 trails Lee's 65. Cook County at $157,160 and Burke County at $175,435 offer lower absolute entry points and overall scores of 68 and 61 respectively, but without rent data to assess their yield profiles. Chattahoochee County at $138,388 has an overall score of 64. Lee is the right choice over Floyd if yield matters to you, since Lee's rent-to-price ratio is about 92 basis points higher. It warrants preference over the lower-priced neighbors when you want the relative liquidity and tenant pool that comes with a slightly larger, more affordable suburban market, and when you're specifically targeting the $269K price band where entry, rent, and resale markets are more active than in smaller, cheaper rural alternatives.
Scenario comparison
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $201,779 | +$13/mo | 6.4% | +0.3% |
Median typical MLS deal | $269,039 | -$340/mo | 4.8% | -6.6% |
125% of median newer / premium | $336,299 | -$693/mo | 3.8% | -10.8% |
Price History
Median Home Price
Median Rent
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
Quick Investment Calculator
Purchase
Monthly Cash Flow
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Score Breakdown
Based on 7.34% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on 1.5% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Investment Outlook
Strengths
- +Above-average rent-to-price ratio (7.34%)
- +Affordable relative to local incomes
- +Complete rent data available
Challenges
- -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$340/mo)
- -Negative leverage (cap rate 4.8% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
Economic Indicators
Who this market fits
- +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
- +Value-add operators who can buy below median and force rent up
- −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
- −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
Compare to Nearby Counties
The Bottom Line
Lee County in Georgia scores 65/100, ranking #253 of 1,000 US counties (top 32%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $340/month; the 7.34% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.
Related markets
Markets like Lee with stronger cash flow
Cheaper alternatives to Lee
Head-to-head comparisons
Rent vs buy in Georgia cities
Frequently asked questions
Ready to Analyze a Deal in Lee?
Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.