Pierce County
Market Snapshot
Pierce market analysis
Pierce County sits at a median home price of $215,541, up 8% year-over-year, with an affordability index of 84 out of 100. The data does not include a median rent figure or cap rate for Pierce itself, which means the cash-flow score comes back at zero and any yield calculation requires the investor to source local rent comps independently before underwriting. What the data does show is an appreciation score of 85 and a national percentile rank of 91st out of 1,000 counties scored, placing Pierce in the top tier for price growth trajectory. This is squarely an appreciation-first market at current pricing. Without a calculated cap rate or cash-on-cash return, an investor cannot assume this pencils as a day-one cash-flow play, and the 6.85% rate environment only tightens that math further.
The profile here fits an appreciation buyer or a patient buy-and-hold investor who can tolerate thin or neutral monthly cash flow in exchange for price momentum. The 8% annual price gain on a $215,541 median translates to roughly $17,200 in equity appreciation per year on a standard acquisition, which is the real return driver. A 20% down payment runs $43,108, and with no cap rate in the data, the investor needs to stress-test rent coverage manually. The stability score of 50 is the number that gives pause. It signals moderate but not exceptional income and employment consistency, which matters if a value-add operator is underwriting forced appreciation through rehab and repositioning. A value-add play could work here given the price point, but exit risk is real if the buyer pool is thin at resale in a smaller market of roughly 19,800 people.
The population of 19,822 is the central risk factor in Pierce County. Small markets concentrate vacancy and absorption risk in ways that larger metros do not. If a single large employer slows hiring, or if the county loses a few hundred residents, rent demand softens faster than county-level data can capture. The data does not provide economic anchor information for Pierce, so no employer-level claims are made here. What that absence itself signals is worth flagging: investors who rely on institutional or government employment anchors to backstop rental demand should do additional ground-level diligence before committing capital.
On carry costs, the combined monthly tax and insurance load comes to $230, based on a state-average effective property tax rate of 0.92% and an insurance rate of 0.36% applied to the $215,541 purchase price. That 0.92% rate is flagged as normal, meaning it does not represent a meaningful tailwind or headwind relative to Georgia broadly. The annual property tax estimate is $1,983 and annual insurance runs $776. Neither number is alarming, but at this interest rate environment, every fixed cost matters. Per the data source, this is a state-average effective rate from Tax Foundation 2024, and the actual county or township rate in Pierce will differ, so the investor should pull the county assessor's current millage rate before finalizing any underwrite.
The neighbor comparison provides useful calibration. Lanier County, priced at $210,778 with a rent-to-price ratio of 0.0981 and a rent of $1,722.50, offers a direct contrast. Lanier's rent-to-price ratio at roughly 9.8 gross rent multiplier equivalent is one of the more complete data pictures in this peer group, and investors who need rent-yield visibility may find Lanier a cleaner starting point. Decatur County carries the highest overall score in the peer group at 77, slightly ahead of Pierce's 74, at a median price of $171,230, which implies better affordability and potentially tighter yield compression. Toombs at $169,068 and Tattnall at $188,123 both score slightly lower but come in at meaningfully lower price points, which could support better gross yields if local rents hold. Cook County at $157,160 and an overall score of 68 is the cheapest entry but scores at the bottom of this peer group.
An investor should choose Pierce over its neighbors when the thesis is specifically price appreciation and the investor has independent rent data showing coverage is workable at current rates. Pierce's 91st percentile national rank and 5th place finish among 159 Georgia counties are the numbers that distinguish it. If the goal is yield-first or income-now, Lanier's available rent-to-price data and Decatur's higher overall score at a lower price point deserve a serious look first.
Price History
Median Home Price
Median Rent
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
Score Breakdown
Rent data not available for cash flow calculation.
Based on 8.0% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Investment Outlook
Strengths
- +Strong price appreciation (+8.0% YoY)
- +Affordable relative to local incomes
Challenges
- -Negative leverage (cap rate 0.0% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
- -Limited rent data (estimates used)
Economic Indicators
Who this market fits
- +Appreciation buyers: YoY growth is meaningfully above the long-run average
- −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
Compare to Nearby Counties
The Bottom Line
Pierce County in Georgia scores 74/100, ranking #74 of 1,000 US counties (top 9%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental roughly breaks even on cash flow. The deal works on appreciation or with better terms, not on month-one cash flow.
Related markets
Markets like Pierce with stronger cash flow
Cheaper alternatives to Pierce
Head-to-head comparisons
Rent vs buy in Georgia cities
Frequently asked questions
Ready to Analyze a Deal in Pierce?
Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.