Stark market analysis
Stark County, Illinois comes in at a median home price of $138,153 with year-over-year appreciation of 6.18%, which is a meaningful price gain for a county at this entry point. The data does not include rent or cap rate figures, which limits the ability to model a complete cash-flow underwrite, but the affordability index of 100 and an appreciation score of 90 out of 100 signal clearly where this market sits on the spectrum: it is an appreciation-first play, not a current-income story. The missing cash flow score of 0 reflects absent rent data rather than negative cash flow, so investors should treat this as an incomplete picture on the income side and conduct independent rent comps before underwriting a deal.
Given the appreciation score of 90 and an overall rank of 4th nationally out of 1,000 counties, the buyer this market suits is one who is willing to accept price-gain exposure as the primary return driver and can carry the asset while appreciation accrues. The $138,153 median price and 20% down payment of roughly $27,631 make the entry cost genuinely low, which helps offset the carry risk inherent in buying on appreciation. A value-add operator willing to bring distressed inventory up to rentable condition and then capture the equity created by a 6.18% annual price trend is the most natural fit here. A pure cash-flow buyer who needs monthly income validated by a gross rent multiplier or cap rate should not underwrite this county without first establishing local rent levels, which this dataset does not provide.
The taxInsurance data presents a serious underwriting consideration that deserves its own line on any pro forma. Illinois carries a state-average effective property tax rate of 2.27%, which is flagged as very high, and on a $138,153 purchase that translates to $3,136 in annual property taxes. Combined with $373 in estimated annual insurance, the combined tax-and-insurance carry is $292 per month before a dollar of debt service, maintenance, or vacancy. At that level, taxes and insurance alone consume a substantial portion of the gross rent on any modest-priced rental, and if local market rents are in the $700-$900 range (which is plausible given neighboring Vermilion County's $815 median rent), the margin for cash flow is thin at best. The 2.27% rate is a state-average estimate per Tax Foundation 2024 data, and actual county or township rates in Stark may differ materially, so verifying the specific mill rate for any target parcel is not optional. Illinois is consistently among the highest property-tax states in the country, and that structural cost should be stress-tested in every scenario.
The primary risk in Stark County is concentration and scale. A population of 5,395 means the rental market is extremely thin, and vacancy in a small-pool market can shift quickly based on a single employer's decisions, a school closing, or demographic drift. The data does not include economic anchors or employer details, so no specific job drivers can be cited, but the demographic math is straightforward: a county this small has limited absorption capacity for new rental supply and limited cushion when demand softens. Any investor buying here should underwrite for extended vacancy between tenants, because the pool of qualified renters at any given moment is structurally limited.
Comparing Stark to its neighbors sharpens the picture. Vermilion County prices in at $93,310 with a rent-to-price ratio of 10.49%, which is a meaningful cash-flow signal and the only county in this dataset with actual rent data. That 10.49% gross yield at Vermilion's entry price is a substantially different risk-return profile than what Stark offers on appreciation alone. Marshall County ($131,595) and Richland County ($132,577) are priced similarly to Stark with equivalent overall scores of 81 and 80 respectively, but without differentiated rent or appreciation data they offer no clear advantage. Menard County at $198,736 is the most expensive neighbor and scores 80 overall, making it the least compelling on pure affordability. Stark earns its place over those similarly scored neighbors specifically because of its top-5 national ranking and 90 appreciation score, which no neighbor matches in this dataset. An investor who chooses Stark over Vermilion is explicitly trading demonstrated cash flow for an appreciation thesis, and that is a trade worth making only with a long hold horizon, verified rent comps, and a hard look at what a 2.27% tax rate does to monthly carry.
Price History
Median Home Price
Median Rent
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
Score Breakdown
Rent data not available for cash flow calculation.
Based on 6.2% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Investment Outlook
Strengths
- +Strong price appreciation (+6.2% YoY)
- +Affordable relative to local incomes
Challenges
- -Negative leverage (cap rate 0.0% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
- -Limited rent data (estimates used)
Economic Indicators
Who this market fits
- +Appreciation buyers: YoY growth is meaningfully above the long-run average
- −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
Compare to Nearby Counties
The Bottom Line
Stark County in Illinois scores 81/100, ranking #4 of 1,000 US counties (top 0%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental roughly breaks even on cash flow. The deal works on appreciation or with better terms, not on month-one cash flow.