Union County
Market Snapshot
Union market analysis
Union County checks in at a 3.06% cap rate and a gross rent-to-price ratio of 0.047, which puts it squarely in appreciation territory rather than cash-flow territory. At a $641,174 median purchase price against $2,515 in median monthly rent, the numbers don't pencil for an income-first buyer financing at 6.85%. The model underwrite produces a monthly mortgage of $3,361, estimated expenses of $880, and an estimated cash flow of negative $1,726 per month, resulting in a cash-on-cash return of negative 14.04% on a $128,235 down payment. Year-over-year home price growth sits at 1.15%, modest in absolute terms but consistent with a market where prices are already high enough that entry-level appreciation compounds meaningfully. An affordability index of 14 out of 100 confirms this is a deeply unaffordable market for owner-occupants, which tends to sustain rental demand but does nothing to help the investor's purchase economics.
The investor profile this county suits is narrow: an appreciation buyer with patient capital and ideally some ability to offset carry costs through value-add repositioning. The cash-on-cash return is negative enough that no reasonable rent bump closes the gap under current financing conditions. A buyer would need either a substantially below-market acquisition, a significant rent premium on a renovated unit, or a long enough hold horizon to let appreciation and eventual mortgage paydown do the work. The overall score of 43 out of 100, with a cash-flow score of 41 and appreciation score of 62, confirms the same picture the raw numbers tell. This is not a market where you buy for monthly income; it's a market where you hold for equity, assuming you can stomach the carry.
On carry costs, the tax burden alone deserves its own line in any underwrite. New Jersey's state-average effective property tax rate is 2.49%, and at that rate on a $641,174 purchase, annual property taxes run approximately $15,965, or roughly $1,330 per month. Combined with an estimated $112 monthly in insurance, total tax and insurance comes to $1,443 per month. That single line item alone represents more than half the monthly rent collected. The propertyTaxFlag here is "very_high," and that designation is warranted: very few markets in the country impose this level of carrying cost as a percentage of value. The caveat from the data applies directly: this is a state-average effective rate sourced from Tax Foundation 2024, and actual county or township rates in Union will vary, potentially materially. Underwrite conservatively and pull actual assessed values and municipal rates for any specific municipality before committing.
Demographically, Union County's population of 572,079 provides scale that limits single-employer or single-sector concentration risk relative to smaller markets, but the affordability index of 14 signals that the pool of potential owner-occupants who can buy their way out of renting is thin. That dynamic sustains rental demand structurally, though it also reflects the broader New Jersey cost burden that has historically pressured population retention among younger renters. The county ranks 721st out of 1,000 nationally and 20th out of 21 New Jersey counties in overall investment score, placing it at the 8th national percentile. That ranking is a clear signal that this is not a generalist buy-and-hold market; it's a market for a specific thesis.
Compared to its neighbors, Union's case gets harder to make. Hudson County carries a higher overall score (48 vs. 43) at a lower median price ($617,352 vs. $641,174) and a meaningfully better rent-to-price ratio of 0.057 vs. Union's 0.047. That spread is not trivial: Hudson's gross yield is roughly 20% higher, which, at these price points, translates to several hundred dollars per month in rent relative to acquisition cost. Passaic County scores 51 overall, comes in at $574,942 median price, and matches Union nearly dollar-for-dollar on rent-to-price (0.048 vs. 0.047), while being roughly $66,000 cheaper to enter. Essex County, at a 47 overall score and $635,686 median price, offers a slightly better rent-to-price than Union at 0.044. Monmouth County and Cape May County both score lower on rent-to-price, so they don't improve the income picture. The case for choosing Union over Hudson or Passaic requires a specific neighborhood thesis, a belief in superior appreciation, or a property-level value-add angle that compensates for the worse county-level yield profile. On the numbers alone, Hudson and Passaic present better starting points for most buy-and-hold investors evaluating northern New Jersey.
Scenario comparison
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $480,880 | -$886/mo | 4.1% | -9.6% |
Median typical MLS deal | $641,174 | -$1,726/mo | 3.1% | -14.0% |
125% of median newer / premium | $801,467 | -$2,567/mo | 2.5% | -16.7% |
Price History
Median Home Price
Median Rent
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
Quick Investment Calculator
Purchase
Monthly Cash Flow
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Score Breakdown
Based on 4.71% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on 1.1% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Investment Outlook
Strengths
- +Complete rent data available
Challenges
- -Below-average rent-to-price ratio (4.71%)
- -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$1,726/mo)
- -Negative leverage (cap rate 3.1% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
- -High price-to-income ratio makes financing challenging
Economic Indicators
Who this market fits
- +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
- −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
- −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
- −You rely on FHA-style financing: prices are stretched relative to local incomes
- −You want a market with broad institutional consensus on fundamentals
Compare to Nearby Counties
The Bottom Line
Union County in New Jersey scores 43/100, ranking #721 of 1,000 US counties (top 92%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $1726/month; the 4.71% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.
Related markets
Markets like Union with stronger cash flow
Cheaper alternatives to Union
Head-to-head comparisons
Rent vs buy in New Jersey cities
Frequently asked questions
Ready to Analyze a Deal in Union?
Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.