Beaufort market analysis
Beaufort County sits at a gross rent-to-price ratio of 6.71%, which places it squarely in the middle ground between pure cash-flow territory and appreciation-driven markets. The cap rate comes in at 4.36%, which is workable but not exceptional, and the model underwrite at 6.85% interest reveals the real problem: after a 20% down payment of $47,018, monthly mortgage service of $1,232 plus $460 in estimated expenses produces negative cash flow of $379 per month, translating to a cash-on-cash return of -8.41%. Year-over-year home price growth of 1.56% is modest enough that appreciation alone will not bail out a leveraged buyer in the near term. The affordability index of 80 tells you the underlying asset is still reasonably priced at a $235,091 median, which matters for future upside, but the current rate environment is doing real damage to the levered returns. This is a market where the numbers look better on paper than they perform at today's financing costs.
Given those returns, the investor best positioned here is either an all-cash or low-leverage buyer who can sidestep the mortgage drag and actually capture the 4.36% cap rate, or a value-add operator who can push rents meaningfully above the $1,313 median. At the current gross rent multiple of roughly 14.9x, there is not enough cushion for a fully leveraged buy-and-hold buyer to sit comfortably in the black from day one. An appreciation buyer considering Beaufort against coastal North Carolina comps should note that 1.56% annual price growth is below what most appreciation-focused investors require to justify accepting negative carry. The cash-flow score of 67 and appreciation score of 66 out of 100 confirm what the raw numbers suggest: this is a middling market on both dimensions, not a standout on either.
The county's stability score of 50 is the most meaningful caution flag in the dataset. For a buy-and-hold investor whose thesis depends on consistent occupancy and rent payment, a stability score at the midpoint of the scale warrants scrutiny before committing capital. Beaufort County has a population of 44,711, which means the rental demand pool is relatively shallow. Small markets with limited population bases can see occupancy fluctuate more sharply in response to local economic shifts than larger metro submarkets would. No economic anchor data was provided for this county, so no employer-specific analysis is possible here, but the population size alone suggests concentration risk, meaning a single large employer contraction or a demographic outflow episode could move vacancy materially.
On carrying costs, the combined monthly tax and insurance figure of $219 is already baked into the $460 estimated expenses figure. North Carolina's state-average effective property tax rate used here is 0.84%, which the Tax Foundation categorizes as normal, and at that level it does not create a special drag relative to most southeastern markets. That said, the note accompanying the data is worth taking seriously: this is a state-average estimate, and actual Beaufort County or township-level rates may differ. Pull the county assessor's millage rate before finalizing any underwrite. Insurance at an implied 0.28% annual rate looks low for a coastal North Carolina county, and given Beaufort's geography, an investor should independently verify wind and flood insurance costs, which can diverge substantially from state-average figures in coastal exposure zones.
Looking at the neighboring counties, Cumberland County is the most direct cash-flow competitor, with a rent-to-price ratio of 7.50% against Beaufort's 6.71% and a lower median price of $227,591. A buyer primarily optimizing for cash-flow potential on a levered basis should model Cumberland first. Cherokee County posts the highest ratio in this peer group at 7.11% with a $274,117 median, though its overall score of 62 trails Beaufort's 65. Davidson County is priced higher at $264,061 with a ratio of 6.57%, slightly below Beaufort, and matches the same overall score of 65, so it offers no clear advantage for either cash-flow or value investors over Beaufort. Perquimans County scores 68 overall, the highest in this group, but no rent data is provided, making a cash-flow comparison impossible from this dataset alone. Surry County, at $220,321 and an overall score of 60, is the cheapest entry point in the peer set but ranks lowest on overall quality metrics.
Choose Beaufort over its neighbors if your thesis is a lower absolute price point combined with a normal tax burden and you are underwriting an all-cash or light-leverage acquisition where the 4.36% cap rate is sufficient. If you are financing at current rates and need positive carry from month one, Cumberland's higher rent-to-price ratio is the more honest starting point, and the model there will likely pencil better before you even run a sensitivity analysis.
Scenario comparison
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $176,318 | -$71/mo | 5.8% | -2.1% |
Median typical MLS deal | $235,091 | -$379/mo | 4.4% | -8.4% |
125% of median newer / premium | $293,864 | -$687/mo | 3.5% | -12.2% |
Price History
Median Home Price
Median Rent
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
Quick Investment Calculator
Purchase
Monthly Cash Flow
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Score Breakdown
Based on 6.71% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on 1.6% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Investment Outlook
Strengths
- +Above-average rent-to-price ratio (6.71%)
- +Affordable relative to local incomes
- +Complete rent data available
Challenges
- -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$379/mo)
- -Negative leverage (cap rate 4.4% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
Economic Indicators
Who this market fits
- +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
- −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
- −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
Compare to Nearby Counties
Section 8 in Beaufort County: payment standards by ZIP, PHA waitlist status, and voucher counts are on VoucherMatch, the same HUD dataset with the tenant demand side attached.
The Bottom Line
Beaufort County in North Carolina scores 65/100, ranking #253 of 1,000 US counties (top 32%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $379/month; the 6.71% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.