Trumbull County

OhioPopulation: 201,749
74
/100
Hold
#74 of 1,000 counties
#19 in Ohio (88 counties)
Analysis by RentalCalcs ResearchIndependent data + algorithm-driven scoring
Updated October 19, 2026Sources: Zillow ZHVI, Zillow ZORI, US Census ACS, Tax Foundation

Market Snapshot

$172,302
Median Home Price
25% below national median
$969/mo
Median Rent
33% below national median
6.75%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Top 31% nationally
-$273
Est. Monthly Cash Flow
With 20% down at 6.9% rate

Trumbull market analysis

Trumbull County's headline numbers place it squarely in the cash-flow-challenged, appreciation-leaning category that trips up investors who run the math too quickly. The gross rent-to-price ratio sits at 6.75%, which sounds workable until you layer in financing. At a 6.85% mortgage rate with 20% down, the modeled monthly mortgage on a $172,302 purchase comes to $903, and once estimated operating expenses of $339 are added, the position runs at negative $273 per month on a cash-flow basis, producing a cash-on-cash return of -8.27%. The cap rate of 4.39% is the more useful unlevered number, and it tells a clearer story: this market does not pencil as a financed buy-and-hold at current rates without either below-market acquisition, rent upside, or a material equity play. That said, the 6.59% year-over-year home price appreciation and an appreciation score of 91 out of 100 suggest the market is doing real work on the equity side, which is where the actual return story lives.

The investor this market suits is not a cash-flow buyer running a spreadsheet at face value. It suits an appreciation-oriented buyer who can tolerate a small monthly carry shortfall, a value-add operator who acquires below the $172,302 median and forces equity through renovation, or an all-cash buyer for whom the 4.39% cap rate is a meaningful yield relative to their cost of capital. The affordability index of 93 and median price under $175,000 mean there is real room to find off-market or distressed assets below that median, which is where the math starts to improve. An operator who acquires at $130,000 to $140,000 and rents at or above the $969 median changes the rent-to-price ratio meaningfully and pushes the cap rate above 5%. The 91st-percentile national ranking and the 6.59% price appreciation also argue for holding through a full cycle rather than optimizing for month-one cash flow.

The tax and insurance picture deserves its own line on the underwrite. The state-average effective property tax rate for Ohio is 1.56%, which the Tax Foundation classifies as high, and the modeled annual tax on a $172,302 asset comes to $2,688, or $224 per month. Add $33 per month in insurance and the combined tax-and-insurance carry is $257 monthly before you touch principal, interest, or maintenance. That figure alone represents 26.5% of the $969 median rent, which is a significant fixed cost regardless of how you finance the deal. Investors accustomed to Sun Belt markets with sub-1% effective tax rates will feel this immediately. The caveat worth repeating: 1.56% is a state-average estimate, and actual county or township rates in Trumbull can differ materially from that figure, so pulling the specific parcel tax bill before closing is not optional.

The stability score of 50 is the risk flag this data raises most directly. Trumbull County is part of the Mahoning Valley, a legacy manufacturing corridor that has faced structural employment challenges for decades. A population of 201,749 is meaningful but not growing rapidly, and a stability score at the midpoint of the scale signals that rental demand is less insulated from economic cycles than in markets built around diversified or growing employment bases. The affordability score of 93 cuts both ways: yes, the market is accessible to renters, but high affordability often correlates with limited wage growth, which caps rent increases over time. Investors should stress-test rent assumptions with modest growth rates and model scenarios in which vacancy is above average.

Compared to its neighbors, Trumbull is neither the cheapest nor the highest-yielding market in the cluster. Belmont County offers a lower median price of $130,448 and a higher rent-to-price ratio of 7.24%, making it the more favorable option for a pure cash-flow operator despite the same overall score of 74. Mahoning County, directly adjacent, prices at $166,839 with a rent-to-price ratio of 7.31% and median rent of $1,016, which is $47 more per month than Trumbull on roughly the same asset price, giving Mahoning a modest edge for financed investors trying to close the cash-flow gap. Cuyahoga County offers higher rents ($1,379 median) and the best rent-to-price ratio in the group at 7.83%, but entry at $211,436 median raises the absolute dollar exposure significantly. Lucas County at $169,370 median also outpaces Trumbull on rent-to-price at 7.83%, with a slightly higher overall score of 75. The case for choosing Trumbull over these neighbors is specifically the appreciation story: the 6.59% year-over-year price growth and 91 appreciation score are not matched in the provided neighbor data, so an investor whose primary thesis is equity accumulation over a five-to-ten-year hold, with tolerance for a modest monthly shortfall, has a reasonable argument for Trumbull. Anyone optimizing for monthly cash flow should look first at Mahoning or Belmont.

Last analyzed October 19, 2026. Based on the latest available Zillow and Census data for Trumbull County.

Scenario comparison

Same $969/mo rent assumption, 20% down, 6.85% rate. What changes is the acquisition price.
ScenarioPurchase priceMonthly cash flowCap rateCash-on-cash
75% of median
value-add or distressed
$129,226-$47/mo5.8%-1.9%
Median
typical MLS deal
$172,302-$273/mo4.4%-8.3%
125% of median
newer / premium
$215,377-$499/mo3.5%-12.1%

Price History

Median Home Price

Median Rent

Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI

Quick Investment Calculator

20%
5%50%100%

Purchase

Purchase Price$172,302
Down Payment (20%)$34,460
Loan Amount$137,842
Interest Rate6.85%

Monthly Cash Flow

Gross Rent+$969
Monthly P&I-$903
Est. Expenses (35%)-$339
Net Cash Flow-$273/mo
4.4%
Cap Rate (all cash)
-8.3%
Cash-on-Cash Return
6.75%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Negative leverage: At 6.85% rates, borrowing costs exceed the 4.4% cap rate. All-cash buyers may see better returns.

* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.

Score Breakdown

Overall Investment Score
74/100
74
Cash Flow(30%)
68/100

Based on 6.75% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.

Appreciation(25%)
91/100

Based on 6.6% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.

Stability(25%)
50/100

Population data not available.

Affordability(20%)
93/100

Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.

Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.

Investment Outlook

Strengths

  • +Above-average rent-to-price ratio (6.75%)
  • +Strong price appreciation (+6.6% YoY)
  • +Affordable relative to local incomes
  • +Complete rent data available

Challenges

  • -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$273/mo)
  • -Negative leverage (cap rate 4.4% < mortgage rate 6.9%)

Economic Indicators

Population
201,749
Median Income
—
Data pending
Unemployment Rate
—
Data pending
Price-to-Income
—
Data pending

Who this market fits

Best for
  • +Appreciation buyers: YoY growth is meaningfully above the long-run average
  • +Patient holders willing to accept negative carry for equity gains
  • +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
  • +Institutional or out-of-state investors who target appreciation markets
Skip if
  • −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
  • −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)

Compare to Nearby Counties

CountyVerdict
LucasOH
75$169,370$1,1057.83%Strong BuyView
CurrentTrumbullOH
74$172,302$9696.75%Buy
BelmontOH
74$130,448$7877.24%BuyView
MahoningOH
74$166,839$1,0167.31%BuyView
CuyahogaOH
73$211,436$1,3797.83%BuyView
MontgomeryOH
73$195,315$1,2447.64%BuyView

Section 8 in Trumbull County: payment standards by ZIP, PHA waitlist status, and voucher counts are on VoucherMatch, the same HUD dataset with the tenant demand side attached.

The Bottom Line

HoldTrumbull scores well overall, but a typical leveraged buy-and-hold loses $273/mo at current rates. Consider house hacking, value-add, or all-cash; otherwise a worse score with positive cash flow may be the better deal.

Trumbull County in Ohio scores 74/100, ranking #74 of 1,000 US counties (top 9%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $273/month; the 6.75% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.

Monthly Cash Flow
$-273/mo
Cap Rate
4.4%
Cash-on-Cash
-8.3%

Related markets

Frequently asked questions

The average cap rate in Trumbull County is 4.39%, based on median home prices of $172,302 and median rents of $969.38. This represents a moderate return for buy-and-hold investors in the region.

Ready to Analyze a Deal in Trumbull?

Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.