Rhea County

TennesseePopulation: 33,031
61
/100
Hold
#344 of 1,000 counties
#31 in Tennessee (95 counties)
Analysis by RentalCalcs ResearchIndependent data + algorithm-driven scoring
Updated October 19, 2026Sources: Zillow ZHVI, Zillow ZORI, US Census ACS, Tax Foundation

Market Snapshot

$264,794
Median Home Price
16% above national median
$1,083/mo
Median Rent
25% below national median
4.91%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Top 78% nationally
-$684
Est. Monthly Cash Flow
With 20% down at 6.9% rate

Rhea market analysis

Rhea County sits at a 3.19% cap rate and a gross rent-to-price ratio of 0.049, which places it firmly on the appreciation side of the spectrum. The median home price of $264,794 paired with median rent of $1,083 per month produces math that simply doesn't work for cash flow at current financing rates. Running a standard leveraged scenario, the model shows a monthly mortgage of $1,388 at 6.85%, leaving an estimated cash flow of negative $684 per month and a cash-on-cash return of -13.48%. That is not a rounding error or a worst-case assumption. It is the baseline, and it should be the starting point for any underwrite. The 4.11% year-over-year home price appreciation and an appreciation score of 83 out of 100 tell you where the market's value proposition actually lives. Rhea ranks 344th nationally out of 1,000 counties analyzed, landing at the 56th percentile overall, which is a middle-of-the-pack outcome that reflects a genuine tension between its appreciation upside and its cash-flow drag.

This market is not suited for a buy-and-hold investor who needs monthly income to service debt at today's rates. The numbers are clear on that. Where Rhea makes sense is for an appreciation buyer with patient capital, ideally deploying a heavier down payment to reduce the monthly bleed, or carrying the property toward a break-even horizon while the 4.11% annual price growth does its work. A value-add operator who can substantially close the gap between the $1,083 median rent and debt service through renovation or repositioning has a path, but that path requires acquiring below the $264,794 median and pushing rents materially higher, neither of which is guaranteed in a county of 33,031 people with an affordability index of 73. The affordability score does indicate relative attainability for owner-occupants and tenants alike, which limits how aggressively an investor can push rents before pricing out the local renter pool.

No economic anchor data was provided for Rhea County, so a detailed employer analysis is not possible here. What the population figure of 33,031 does signal is a small, relatively illiquid market. Tenant pools are thin compared to metro counties, which compresses the cushion an investor has against vacancy, and resale markets for investor-grade rental properties are narrower. That context matters when modeling hold periods and exit assumptions.

The combined monthly tax and insurance figure of $236, derived from a 0.71% state-average property tax rate and a 0.36% insurance rate, is already baked into the $379 estimated monthly expense figure. At 0.71%, the tax rate is flagged as normal, and it is, Tennessee is one of the lower property-tax states nationally, which provides a modest but real structural advantage relative to markets in Illinois, Texas, or New Jersey. That said, the state-average effective rate used here is an estimate sourced from Tax Foundation 2024 data, and actual county or township assessments in Rhea County may differ, so pull the county assessor's current millage rate before finalizing your underwrite.

The primary risk in Rhea is concentration, specifically the combination of a small population, a single-digit cap rate at current prices, and reliance on appreciation to generate returns. If price growth slows or reverses, the negative cash-on-cash return of -13.48% has no earnings buffer to absorb it. There is no vacancy or crime data in the provided dataset to assess those vectors directly, but a county this size warrants conservative vacancy assumptions regardless, because a single vacant unit represents a disproportionately large share of a small portfolio's gross income.

Against its neighbors, Rhea's rent-to-price ratio of 0.049 is the weakest in the comparison set. Shelby County comes in at 0.076 with a median home price of $215,746 and median rent of $1,364, delivering substantially better cash-flow mechanics despite a comparable overall score of 61. Madison County mirrors that story at 0.075 and a $1,386 median rent on a $222,286 median price. Anderson County and Greene County both post ratios in the 0.063 to 0.065 range, better than Rhea and with more population scale. Carroll County, at a $180,314 median home price, likely offers the most accessible entry point in the peer group, though rent data was not provided so a full ratio comparison is not possible. An investor prioritizing monthly cash flow should look at Shelby or Madison before Rhea. The case for choosing Rhea over these neighbors comes down to one variable: if the appreciation score of 83 reflects a genuine price growth trajectory that the other markets do not share, and if you have the capital and risk tolerance to carry negative cash flow while that appreciation compounds, Rhea earns its place. Otherwise, the neighboring counties offer more forgiving entry-level math.

Last analyzed October 19, 2026. Based on the latest available Zillow and Census data for Rhea County.

Scenario comparison

Same $1,083/mo rent assumption, 20% down, 6.85% rate. What changes is the acquisition price.
ScenarioPurchase priceMonthly cash flowCap rateCash-on-cash
75% of median
value-add or distressed
$198,596-$337/mo4.3%-8.8%
Median
typical MLS deal
$264,794-$684/mo3.2%-13.5%
125% of median
newer / premium
$330,993-$1,031/mo2.5%-16.3%

Price History

Median Home Price

Median Rent

Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI

Quick Investment Calculator

20%
5%50%100%

Purchase

Purchase Price$264,794
Down Payment (20%)$52,959
Loan Amount$211,835
Interest Rate6.85%

Monthly Cash Flow

Gross Rent+$1,083
Monthly P&I-$1,388
Est. Expenses (35%)-$379
Net Cash Flow-$684/mo
3.2%
Cap Rate (all cash)
-13.5%
Cash-on-Cash Return
4.91%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Negative leverage: At 6.85% rates, borrowing costs exceed the 3.2% cap rate. All-cash buyers may see better returns.

* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.

Score Breakdown

Overall Investment Score
61/100
61
Cash Flow(30%)
44/100

Based on 4.91% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.

Appreciation(25%)
83/100

Based on 4.1% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.

Stability(25%)
50/100

Population data not available.

Affordability(20%)
73/100

Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.

Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.

Investment Outlook

Strengths

  • +Affordable relative to local incomes
  • +Complete rent data available

Challenges

  • -Below-average rent-to-price ratio (4.91%)
  • -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$684/mo)
  • -Negative leverage (cap rate 3.2% < mortgage rate 6.9%)

Economic Indicators

Population
33,031
Median Income
—
Data pending
Unemployment Rate
—
Data pending
Price-to-Income
—
Data pending

Who this market fits

Best for
  • +Patient holders willing to accept negative carry for equity gains
  • +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
Skip if
  • −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
  • −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)

Compare to Nearby Counties

CountyVerdict
CarrollTN
63$180,314Est. pending—BuyView
AndersonTN
62$301,800$1,6016.36%BuyView
GreeneTN
62$240,638$1,3086.52%BuyView
CurrentRheaTN
61$264,794$1,0834.91%Buy
ShelbyTN
61$215,746$1,3647.58%BuyView
MadisonTN
60$222,286$1,3867.48%BuyView

Section 8 in Rhea County: payment standards by ZIP, PHA waitlist status, and voucher counts are on VoucherMatch, the same HUD dataset with the tenant demand side attached.

The Bottom Line

HoldRhea scores well overall, but a typical leveraged buy-and-hold loses $684/mo at current rates. Consider house hacking, value-add, or all-cash; otherwise a worse score with positive cash flow may be the better deal.

Rhea County in Tennessee scores 61/100, ranking #344 of 1,000 US counties (top 44%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $684/month; the 4.91% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.

Monthly Cash Flow
$-684/mo
Cap Rate
3.2%
Cash-on-Cash
-13.5%

Related markets

Frequently asked questions

Rhea County has an average cap rate of 3.19%, which is below the national benchmark and indicates modest cash flow potential for buy-and-hold investors.

Ready to Analyze a Deal in Rhea?

Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.