Dickens County

TexasPopulation: 1,570
50
/100
Hold
#600 of 1,000 counties
#143 in Texas (243 counties)
Analysis by RentalCalcs ResearchIndependent data + algorithm-driven scoring
Updated August 8, 2026Sources: Zillow ZHVI, Zillow ZORI, US Census ACS, Tax Foundation

Market Snapshot

$97,037
Median Home Price
58% below national median
$5,863/mo
Est. Rent
Based on regional data
6.04%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Estimated from price data
+$0
Est. Monthly Cash Flow
With 20% down at 6.9% rate

Dickens market analysis

Dickens County, Texas sits at a median home price of $97,037, making it one of the most affordable entry points in the state. The affordability index of 99 out of 100 confirms this is essentially the floor of the Texas market. Yet affordability alone doesn't build a cash-flow case: the tool returns a cap rate of 0 and a cash-on-cash return of 0, which signals that reliable rental rate data sufficient to model returns is absent, not necessarily that the market produces zero income. What the scores do tell you clearly is that the cash-flow score is 0 and the appreciation score is 13 out of 100. Home prices dropped 5.98% year-over-year, and the county ranks in the 23rd percentile nationally out of 1,000 counties scored. This is not a market you underwrite for price gains, and the rental income math cannot be confirmed from available data. The overall score of 50 is a median placeholder, not an endorsement.

The investor profile this market might attract is a deep-value or contrarian buyer, not a conventional cash-flow or appreciation investor. At $97,037, a 20% down payment is only $19,407, the lowest barrier to entry imaginable in Texas. If someone is willing to do significant due diligence on local rents, vacancy, and tenant demand, a purchase at this price point theoretically leaves room to generate a yield, but that work falls entirely on the buyer because the data here cannot confirm a return. An appreciation buyer has no case: a 5.98% price decline over the past year and an appreciation score of 13 point in the opposite direction. A value-add operator would need to verify that tenant demand exists at all in a county of 1,570 people before committing capital to renovation costs.

The economic context is the most critical variable this dataset cannot fully answer, and no economic anchors or employer data were provided for Dickens County. What the population figure does tell you is stark: 1,570 residents in an entire county means the rental universe is extremely small. Median household income of $46,638 creates a theoretical rent ceiling, and in a county this size, losing even one or two anchor employers or a handful of residents to out-migration can shift the vacancy rate meaningfully. Stability scores of 50 reflect neither particular resilience nor fragility based on the available data, but the population size alone is a structural constraint that no score fully captures.

Carry costs deserve direct attention on the underwrite. At a Texas state-average effective property tax rate of 1.80%, this qualifies as high, and the tool flags it as such. On a $97,037 purchase, that produces estimated annual property taxes of $1,747. Add estimated annual insurance of $485, and the combined monthly tax and insurance burden is $186. On an asset priced this low, $186 per month in fixed carry costs is a real percentage of any gross rent you could reasonably charge. If market rent in the area is $700 to $800 per month, taxes and insurance alone consume roughly 23% to 27% of gross income before debt service, maintenance, or vacancy. That state-average rate carries the caveat noted in the data: actual county and township rates in Dickens County may differ, so pulling the county appraisal district's current rate before closing is a non-negotiable step.

The primary risks here are concentration and demographic. A population of 1,570 means near-total dependence on whatever local economic activity exists, with no diversification across industries or employers. Any contraction in the local economy, whether agricultural, public sector, or otherwise, ripples immediately through rental demand. Regulatory risk is not specifically flagged in the data. The year-over-year price decline of 5.98% may reflect secular population loss rather than a cyclical correction, and those two scenarios have very different recovery trajectories. An investor needs to assess which one applies before committing.

Comparing Dickens to its neighbors makes the positioning clearer. Fayette County, at a median of $461,946, and Rains County at $284,463, are different markets entirely, priced for buyers expecting either stronger rental demand or appreciation. Red River County at $161,421 and Calhoun County at $197,656 sit in a middle range with identical or one-point-lower overall scores, meaning the data does not show Dickens outperforming either on investment fundamentals despite its dramatically lower price point. Menard County at $206,500 and a score of 49 is essentially a peer. The case for choosing Dickens over any of these neighbors comes down to whether the absolute dollar entry point, under $100,000, solves a specific problem for your portfolio, such as minimizing capital at risk in a speculative position or acquiring a property with a very small mortgage. It is not supported by the scores or the price trend as a superior cash-flow or appreciation bet relative to its neighbors.

Last analyzed August 8, 2026. Based on the latest available Zillow and Census data for Dickens County.

Price History

Median Home Price

Median Rent

Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI

Score Breakdown

Overall Investment Score
50/100
50
Cash Flow(30%)
0/100

Rent data not available for cash flow calculation.

Appreciation(25%)
13/100

Based on -6.0% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.

Stability(25%)
50/100

Population data not available.

Affordability(20%)
99/100

Price-to-income ratio of 2.1x. Lower ratios indicate more affordable markets.

Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.

Investment Outlook

Strengths

  • +Affordable relative to local incomes

Challenges

  • -Declining home values (-6.0% YoY)
  • -Negative leverage (cap rate 0.0% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
  • -Limited rent data (estimates used)

Economic Indicators

Population
1,570
Median Income
$46,638
vs $54,921 national est.
Unemployment Rate
Data pending
Price-to-Income
2.1x
Very affordable

Who this market fits

Skip if
  • You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
  • You expect appreciation to carry the deal, but prices have declined year over year

Compare to Nearby Counties

CountyVerdict
RainsTX
51$284,463Est. pendingHoldView
CurrentDickensTX
50$97,037Est. pendingHold
FayetteTX
50$461,946Est. pendingHoldView
CalhounTX
50$197,656Est. pendingHoldView
MenardTX
49$206,500Est. pendingHoldView
Red RiverTX
49$161,421Est. pendingHoldView

Section 8 in Dickens County: payment standards by ZIP, PHA waitlist status, and voucher counts are on VoucherMatch, the same HUD dataset with the tenant demand side attached.

The Bottom Line

HoldDickens is a neutral market.

Dickens County in Texas scores 50/100, ranking #600 of 1,000 US counties (top 77%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental roughly breaks even on cash flow. The deal works on appreciation or with better terms, not on month-one cash flow.

Monthly Cash Flow
+$0/mo
Cap Rate
0.0%
Cash-on-Cash
0.0%

Related markets

Frequently asked questions

Cap rate data is not currently available for Dickens County, which typically indicates limited rental income data in this rural Texas market with a population of 1,570.

Ready to Analyze a Deal in Dickens?

Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.