Richmond market analysis
Richmond County sits at a gross rent-to-price ratio of 8.36%, which is meaningful. That figure puts the county well above the national threshold where cash flow becomes plausible, and the 5.43% cap rate confirms it. Home prices at $194,252 and monthly rent at $1,353 produce a price-to-rent ratio of roughly 12, the kind of number that historically favors owning over renting and keeps tenant demand from evaporating when rates shift. Year-over-year price growth of 2.41% is modest, sitting comfortably below headline inflation in most categories, which tells you this market is not pricing in a speculative premium. The affordability index of 88 reinforces that: this is not a market where buyers are stretching, and that tends to keep prices from correcting sharply in downturns.
The modeled underwrite, however, deserves a hard look before anyone gets comfortable. At a 6.85% rate with 20% down, the monthly mortgage on a median-priced asset is $1,018, and when you add $473 in estimated expenses, total outflows exceed the $1,353 median rent by $139 per month. That produces a cash-on-cash return of -3.73% on current financing. The cap rate of 5.43% tells you the asset itself pencils, but the debt does not at this rate environment. This is squarely a market for buyers who can either pay closer to cash, carry modest negative leverage with an eye toward rent growth, or source properties below the median where the numbers close. The 91st-percentile national ranking and 5th-place finish among 159 Georgia counties reflect the underlying asset quality, not a guarantee of day-one cash flow.
Given that profile, Richmond is best suited to two buyer types. Value-add operators who can acquire below median, force appreciation through renovation, and reposition rents above $1,353 have the clearest path to positive cash flow. The second group is the patient appreciation buyer who wants a low-price-point asset with a real cap rate as a floor, not a ceiling, and who expects rent growth and potential rate refinancing to close the carry gap over time. A pure cash-flow buyer expecting day-one positive returns at 80% LTV will find this market frustrating unless they locate off-market deals or distressed assets priced meaningfully below $194,252.
On carry costs, the combined monthly tax and insurance burden is $207, which is included in the $473 expense figure. Georgia's state-average effective property tax rate is 0.92%, which the Tax Foundation classifies as normal, and the annual tax bill on the median asset runs $1,787. This is not a tax drag that will make or break a deal, but it deserves its own line in your model. Keep in mind that 0.92% is a state-average estimate and actual Richmond County or township-level rates may differ, so pull the county assessor data before finalizing any underwrite. Insurance at 0.36% annually adds $699, unremarkable for Georgia.
The stability score of 50 is the number that warrants the most attention. It is the lowest subscored category in this market and signals concentration or demand variability risk. Richmond County anchors Augusta, a mid-sized market that is heavily influenced by the presence of Fort Eisenhower, the major military installation formerly known as Fort Gordon. Military-driven rental demand is real and consistent, but it comes with a specific risk: base realignment or mission shifts can move thousands of households in a short window. Any investor building a portfolio here should think through their exposure to that single demand driver and consider whether their specific assets are close enough to the base to be affected disproportionately.
Among the neighboring counties in the comparison set, Decatur County scores highest at 77, three points above Richmond's 74, and carries a lower median price of $171,230. That makes it worth a look for a buyer whose primary concern is entry cost. Lanier County offers the most aggressive rent-to-price ratio in the group at 9.81% against a $210,779 median, which is a stronger cash-flow setup than Richmond, though the overall score of 73 is marginally lower. Toombs, Tattnall, and Cook all score below Richmond and carry lower price points, but none overtakes it on the combined metric of cap rate, national ranking, and rent-to-price yield. Choose Richmond over its neighbors when you want a larger market with more tenant depth, more resale liquidity, and the institutional demand profile that a county of 206,000 people anchored by a major military installation provides. Choose a neighbor when you need a lower entry point and are willing to accept thinner tenant pools in exchange.
Scenario comparison
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $145,689 | +$116/mo | 7.2% | +4.2% |
Median typical MLS deal | $194,252 | -$139/mo | 5.4% | -3.7% |
125% of median newer / premium | $242,815 | -$393/mo | 4.3% | -8.4% |
Price History
Median Home Price
Median Rent
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
Quick Investment Calculator
Purchase
Monthly Cash Flow
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Score Breakdown
Based on 8.36% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on 2.4% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Investment Outlook
Strengths
- +Above-average rent-to-price ratio (8.36%)
- +Affordable relative to local incomes
- +Complete rent data available
Challenges
- -Negative leverage (cap rate 5.4% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
Economic Indicators
Who this market fits
- +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
- +Value-add operators who can buy below median and force rent up
- +Institutional or out-of-state investors who target appreciation markets
- −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
- −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
Compare to Nearby Counties
Section 8 in Richmond County: payment standards by ZIP, PHA waitlist status, and voucher counts are on VoucherMatch, the same HUD dataset with the tenant demand side attached.
The Bottom Line
Richmond County in Georgia scores 74/100, ranking #74 of 1,000 US counties (top 9%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $139/month; the 8.36% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.
Related markets
Markets like Richmond with stronger cash flow
Cheaper alternatives to Richmond
Head-to-head comparisons
Average rent by city in Richmond County
- Average rent in Augusta$1,309/mo
Typical asking rent across each city's ZIP codes (Zillow Observed Rent Index). Open a city for rent by ZIP and bedroom count.