Jackson County

GeorgiaPopulation: 77,033
52
/100
Hold
#560 of 1,000 counties
#92 in Georgia (159 counties)
Analysis by RentalCalcs ResearchIndependent data + algorithm-driven scoring
Updated October 19, 2026Sources: Zillow ZHVI, Zillow ZORI, US Census ACS, Tax Foundation

Market Snapshot

$400,788
Median Home Price
75% above national median
$2,138/mo
Median Rent
48% above national median
6.40%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Top 40% nationally
-$711
Est. Monthly Cash Flow
With 20% down at 6.9% rate

Jackson market analysis

Jackson County's headline numbers put it squarely in the middle of the cash-flow-versus-appreciation spectrum, leaning toward the cash-flow side without fully delivering on it. The median home price of $400,788 against median rent of $2,137 produces a rent-to-price ratio of 0.064, which is meaningfully better than many suburban Georgia counties but not enough to generate positive leverage at today's rates. At a 6.85% mortgage rate, the model underwrite shows a monthly mortgage of $2,101, estimated expenses of $748, and a resulting cash flow of negative $711 per month. The cap rate of 4.16% tells the more honest story: the unlevered yield is real but thin, and once you add financing at 6.85%, the spread goes negative fast. The cash-on-cash return of negative 9.26% on an $80,158 down payment confirms this is not a market where standard 20%-down financing pencils out at median prices. Year-over-year home price change of negative 0.54% offers no near-term appreciation cushion, and the appreciation score of 47 out of 100 reflects that. The overall score of 52 and a national percentile of 28 put Jackson in the lower half of the 1,000-county sample, ranking 92nd out of 159 Georgia counties.

The investor most likely to find value here is a cash-heavy buyer who can reduce or eliminate the mortgage drag, or an operator willing to work below the median price point where the rent-to-price math can improve. At a 4.16% cap rate, an all-cash buyer earns roughly $16,673 annually on a $400,788 asset, which is modest but not trivial relative to alternatives. A value-add operator buying distressed assets below median has the best shot at compressing the price while holding rents near the $2,137 market rate, which would push the effective rent-to-price ratio meaningfully higher. Appreciation buyers are the worst fit: a score of 47 on appreciation and a slightly negative price trend over the past year offer little support for a thesis built on equity growth. The affordability index of 44 also signals that the renter pool may face income pressure at higher rent levels, which limits the upside on rent growth.

The taxInsurance data adds an important line to any underwrite. The combined monthly tax and insurance load runs $428, built from an estimated annual property tax of $3,687 (using a 0.92% state-average effective rate per Tax Foundation 2024 data) and annual insurance of $1,443. That $428 monthly figure represents more than half of the $748 in total estimated expenses and is not a line you want to gloss over. The 0.92% rate is flagged as normal, which means it is neither a tailwind nor a penalty relative to the national range, but the absolute dollar amount on a $400,788 asset is still material. As always, the 0.92% is a state-average estimate and actual rates at the county and township level in Jackson County may differ, so pulling the specific millage rate before closing is non-negotiable on any deal here.

The primary risk in Jackson County is a combination of price-point and financing sensitivity. With a stability score of 50 and an affordability index of 44, the market is neither particularly resilient nor priced for easy entry. If rates stay elevated or move higher, the already negative cash-on-cash return worsens further, and there is no strong appreciation trend to bail out a leveraged buyer. Demographic concentration risk is worth watching given a population of only 77,033: a county this size can see meaningful rental demand shifts from relatively small employer changes, and while no vacancy or crime data is provided here, smaller markets typically have less liquidity and longer re-leasing timelines than larger metros. There is no economic anchors data provided for Jackson County, so no specific employer or sector analysis can be made.

Compared to its neighbors, Jackson competes most directly with DeKalb County, which carries a nearly identical rent-to-price ratio of 0.0633 against a median price of $334,013. DeKalb's lower entry point means the absolute dollar carry costs are lower even if the ratio is similar, which makes it easier to find deals that work at standard leverage. Cherokee County has a higher median of $467,717 but a significantly weaker rent-to-price ratio of 0.0526, making it the weakest cash-flow option in this peer set and better suited to appreciation buyers, though its score of 51 does not strongly support that thesis either. Catoosa County's rent-to-price of 0.0537 and median price of $288,372 offer a lower price floor but worse yield dynamics than Jackson. Marion and Charlton counties, at medians of $178,735 and $208,414 respectively, are far cheaper entry points and score comparably at 51, which suggests investors chasing the lowest absolute risk capital should look there first. Jackson makes the most sense over its neighbors when an investor has a specific sourcing advantage in the area, such as an existing contractor or management relationship, that lets them buy below median and manage expenses tightly, since the market-level numbers alone do not differentiate it enough to prefer it on yield or appreciation grounds.

Last analyzed October 19, 2026. Based on the latest available Zillow and Census data for Jackson County.

Scenario comparison

Same $2,138/mo rent assumption, 20% down, 6.85% rate. What changes is the acquisition price.
ScenarioPurchase priceMonthly cash flowCap rateCash-on-cash
75% of median
value-add or distressed
$300,591-$186/mo5.5%-3.2%
Median
typical MLS deal
$400,788-$711/mo4.2%-9.3%
125% of median
newer / premium
$500,985-$1,237/mo3.3%-12.9%

Price History

Median Home Price

Median Rent

Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI

Quick Investment Calculator

20%
5%50%100%

Purchase

Purchase Price$400,788
Down Payment (20%)$80,158
Loan Amount$320,630
Interest Rate6.85%

Monthly Cash Flow

Gross Rent+$2,138
Monthly P&I-$2,101
Est. Expenses (35%)-$748
Net Cash Flow-$711/mo
4.2%
Cap Rate (all cash)
-9.3%
Cash-on-Cash Return
6.40%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Negative leverage: At 6.85% rates, borrowing costs exceed the 4.2% cap rate. All-cash buyers may see better returns.

* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.

Score Breakdown

Overall Investment Score
52/100
52
Cash Flow(30%)
64/100

Based on 6.40% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.

Appreciation(25%)
47/100

Based on -0.5% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.

Stability(25%)
50/100

Population data not available.

Affordability(20%)
44/100

Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.

Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.

Investment Outlook

Strengths

  • +Complete rent data available

Challenges

  • -Declining home values (-0.5% YoY)
  • -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$711/mo)
  • -Negative leverage (cap rate 4.2% < mortgage rate 6.9%)

Economic Indicators

Population
77,033
Median Income
—
Data pending
Unemployment Rate
—
Data pending
Price-to-Income
—
Data pending

Who this market fits

Best for
  • +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
Skip if
  • −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
  • −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
  • −You expect appreciation to carry the deal, but prices have declined year over year

Compare to Nearby Counties

CountyVerdict
CatoosaGA
53$288,372$1,2905.37%HoldView
CurrentJacksonGA
52$400,788$2,1386.40%Hold
MarionGA
51$178,735Est. pending—HoldView
CharltonGA
51$208,414Est. pending—HoldView
DekalbGA
51$334,013$1,7626.33%HoldView
CherokeeGA
51$467,717$2,0505.26%HoldView

Section 8 in Jackson County: payment standards by ZIP, PHA waitlist status, and voucher counts are on VoucherMatch, the same HUD dataset with the tenant demand side attached.

The Bottom Line

HoldJackson is a neutral market. Consider house hacking or targeting below-market deals.

Jackson County in Georgia scores 52/100, ranking #560 of 1,000 US counties (top 72%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $711/month; the 6.40% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.

Monthly Cash Flow
$-711/mo
Cap Rate
4.2%
Cash-on-Cash
-9.3%

Related markets

Frequently asked questions

Jackson County has an average cap rate of 4.16%, which is relatively modest for a rental investment and indicates limited cash flow potential on a median-priced property.

Ready to Analyze a Deal in Jackson?

Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.