Washington market analysis
Washington County, Texas sits at a 3.42% cap rate with a gross rent-to-price ratio of 0.0526, or about 5.26% annualized. Those numbers put it squarely in appreciation territory on the cash-flow-versus-appreciation spectrum, though the appreciation case isn't compelling either: home prices moved just 0.21% year-over-year, barely ahead of zero in real terms. At a $363,966 median purchase price and $1,595.64 median rent, the math doesn't close for a leveraged buyer at current rates. Running a 20% down payment ($72,793) at 6.85% produces a monthly mortgage of $1,908, and with $558 in estimated operating expenses the modeled cash flow lands at negative $870 per month, a cash-on-cash return of negative 12.47%. This is not a market that pencils for a debt-financed buy-and-hold at today's rates.
The investor this county might attract is a low-leverage or all-cash buyer hunting modest yield with low volatility, or someone who already owns here and is evaluating whether to hold. For a cash buyer, a 3.42% cap rate is thin even by Texas standards, and an affordability index of 52 out of 100 means renters here aren't flush, which limits rent-growth upside. A pure appreciation buyer finds little encouragement in a 0.21% price gain. A value-add operator could theoretically buy below median, force appreciation through renovation, and refinance later, but that strategy requires a significant discount to the median to create margin, and Washington County's relatively small size (35,807 residents) limits the resale and re-lease pool. None of these investor profiles find an easy fit; this market scores 49 on cash flow and 52 on appreciation, essentially average on both, which means it doesn't lead on either dimension.
On the carry-cost side, the tax and insurance picture is a real underwriting consideration that deserves its own line. At a state-average effective property tax rate of 1.80%, Texas already runs high nationally, and Washington County's estimated annual tax burden comes to $6,551, with insurance adding another $1,820 per year. Combined, that's $698 per month in tax and insurance alone before a single dollar of mortgage, maintenance, or vacancy is counted. The propertyTaxFlag here is "high," which is accurate: at 1.80% the state-average rate creates a structurally heavy cost base, and if the actual county or township rate runs above the state average (which it may, per the Tax Foundation methodology used here), that figure gets worse. Any underwrite that doesn't isolate this line item will overstate returns.
Washington County ranks 575th out of 1,000 counties nationally, landing in the 27th percentile, and 137th out of 243 counties within Texas. Those rankings reflect a market that offers nothing particularly differentiated: median performance on stability (50), affordability (52), and overall score (51). Without a named economic anchor in the data, it isn't possible to speak to employer concentration or job-base stability, and inventing that context would be misleading.
Comparing Washington to its neighbors makes the case for looking elsewhere sharper. Henderson County at a $267,226 median and a 5.93% rent-to-price ratio offers meaningfully better yield mechanics and carries the same overall score of 52. Bastrop County, priced similarly to Washington at $356,064, generates a 6.03% gross rent-to-price ratio on $1,790 median rent, which is 77 basis points better than Washington's 5.26%, and sits in Austin's growth corridor, a demand driver Washington lacks. Rains County at $284,463 and Hill County at $223,626 are cheaper entry points with the same overall score of 51, giving investors more room to structure debt or pursue value-add without needing as large a discount to median. Washington County makes sense over these neighbors only if a specific asset, a particular location advantage, or a below-market acquisition price justifies the premium. On the raw metrics provided, none of the neighbors is strictly worse, and Henderson and Bastrop both carry superior rent-to-price ratios at comparable or lower prices.
Scenario comparison
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $272,975 | -$393/mo | 4.6% | -7.5% |
Median typical MLS deal | $363,966 | -$870/mo | 3.4% | -12.5% |
125% of median newer / premium | $454,958 | -$1,347/mo | 2.7% | -15.4% |
Price History
Median Home Price
Median Rent
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
Quick Investment Calculator
Purchase
Monthly Cash Flow
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Score Breakdown
Based on 5.26% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on 0.2% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Investment Outlook
Strengths
- +Complete rent data available
Challenges
- -Below-average rent-to-price ratio (5.26%)
- -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$870/mo)
- -Negative leverage (cap rate 3.4% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
Economic Indicators
Who this market fits
- +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
- −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
- −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
Compare to Nearby Counties
Section 8 in Washington County: payment standards by ZIP, PHA waitlist status, and voucher counts are on VoucherMatch, the same HUD dataset with the tenant demand side attached.
The Bottom Line
Washington County in Texas scores 51/100, ranking #575 of 1,000 US counties (top 73%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $870/month; the 5.26% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.