Monroe market analysis
Monroe County sits at a gross rent-to-price ratio of 5.40%, which lands it firmly on the appreciation side of the cash-flow/appreciation spectrum. At a 3.51% cap rate and a modeled cash-on-cash return of negative 12.08% at 6.85% interest, the deal math on a financed purchase is not close to working for a cash-flow buyer at median price points. The $1,289 median rent against a $1,501 monthly mortgage payment, before any expenses, tells you the story immediately. The model's estimated $663 monthly cash deficit is not a rounding error, it's structural. What Monroe does offer is 5.21% year-over-year home price appreciation and an appreciation score of 87 out of 100, which is the real thesis here. The $286,339 median home price with an affordability index of 69 suggests the market is not cheap but not yet priced out, leaving some runway if appreciation continues.
This market suits an appreciation buyer or a patient equity-build investor who can carry negative cash flow without distress. It does not suit a cash-flow buyer at current financing costs. A value-add operator could potentially compress the gap if they can acquire below median and force rents above the $1,289 median, but the cap rate of 3.51% means you need to buy well below asking to make the numbers work even on a value-add basis. An all-cash buyer reduces the burden significantly since the mortgage payment disappears, but even then a 3.51% cap rate is a thin yield for a county with a stability score of 50 out of 100. The appreciation score of 87 is the dominant reason to be here.
The taxInsurance data shows a combined monthly tax and insurance burden of $255, using a state-average effective property tax rate of 0.71%. That rate is flagged as normal, meaning it's neither a tailwind nor a headwind worth isolating. However, $255 per month is still a real line on the underwrite, representing roughly 20% of the $1,289 median rent before you touch the mortgage, maintenance, or vacancy. The note from Tax Foundation 2024 is worth taking seriously: actual county and township rates in Monroe may differ from the 0.71% state average, so confirm the specific assessor rate before closing. Tennessee has no state income tax, which is a soft structural tailwind for landlords relative to higher-tax states, but it is not captured in the modeled numbers here.
Monroe County's population of 46,489 means this is a small market. Small markets carry concentration risk by nature: a single employer expanding or contracting, a demographic shift, or a change in regional economic activity can move vacancy and rents in ways that a larger metro would absorb without much disruption. The stability score of 50 out of 100 reflects that. No economic anchors or specific employer data were provided, so it would be speculation to point to any particular demand driver. What the population figure does confirm is that Monroe is not a deep market with multiple competing demand sources, which makes tenant quality and lease management more consequential than in a larger MSA.
Comparing Monroe to its neighbors sharpens the picture. Anderson County carries a rent-to-price ratio of 6.36% against Monroe's 5.40%, and Greene County runs 6.52%, both on comparable or lower price points. Greene County at a $240,638 median home price and 6.52% gross yield is the most cash-flow-accessible option among the five neighbors listed, while Monroe's 5.40% yield at a $286,339 price point is the weakest on that metric. Shelby County and Madison County, at 7.58% and 7.48% gross yields respectively, are clearly superior for cash-flow buyers, though they carry different market dynamics and overall scores of 61 and 60 versus Monroe's 63. Monroe's overall score of 63 is the highest in this peer group, driven almost entirely by the appreciation score of 87. Choose Monroe when your investment thesis is price appreciation and you are prepared to carry negative monthly cash flow in exchange for a market that has outpaced neighbors on home price growth. Choose Anderson or Greene County when you need better yield with a similar appreciation profile, and choose Shelby or Madison County when cash flow is the priority and you can accept a lower appreciation profile.
Scenario comparison
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $214,754 | -$288/mo | 4.7% | -7.0% |
Median typical MLS deal | $286,339 | -$663/mo | 3.5% | -12.1% |
125% of median newer / premium | $357,924 | -$1,038/mo | 2.8% | -15.1% |
Price History
Median Home Price
Median Rent
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
Quick Investment Calculator
Purchase
Monthly Cash Flow
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Score Breakdown
Based on 5.40% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on 5.2% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Based on price relative to estimated local incomes.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Investment Outlook
Strengths
- +Strong price appreciation (+5.2% YoY)
- +Complete rent data available
Challenges
- -Below-average rent-to-price ratio (5.40%)
- -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$663/mo)
- -Negative leverage (cap rate 3.5% < mortgage rate 6.9%)
Economic Indicators
Who this market fits
- +Appreciation buyers: YoY growth is meaningfully above the long-run average
- +Patient holders willing to accept negative carry for equity gains
- +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
- −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
- −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)
Compare to Nearby Counties
Section 8 in Monroe County: payment standards by ZIP, PHA waitlist status, and voucher counts are on VoucherMatch, the same HUD dataset with the tenant demand side attached.
The Bottom Line
Monroe County in Tennessee scores 63/100, ranking #295 of 1,000 US counties (top 38%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $663/month; the 5.40% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.